Trump discusses Venezuela with advisers as Hegseth distances himself from second strike on suspected drug boat –as it happened

 Trump discusses Venezuela with advisers as Hegseth distances himself from second strike on suspected drug boat –as it happened

Trump discusses Venezuela with advisers as Hegseth distances himself from second strike on suspected drug boat –as it happened. We've almost stopped it, about 85% of it, you've probably noticed, people don't want to deliver C. We're starting to stop Thembiland too.

That land is VERYSOON. We warned them to stop sending poison to our country because President Trump is preparing more action to deal with narco-terrorism.

Democrats are busy attacking the administration, but they are moving again to "confront" the claim that Secretary of War Pat Hegseth ordered the military to kill all alleged terrorists

who are on board suspected drug smuggling ships. Do you believe that if there were a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that would constitute war crimes?

It seems to me that if misinformation has been given, I have serious concerns about someone in that chain of command. It is very possible that war crimes were committed.

Even if you authorized it. If this reporting is clear, it is a violation of the laws of war. If it is accurate, it rises to the level of war crimes.

There is something to this beyond the inflammatory rhetoric. Republican-led congressional committees will be closely examining it to ensure that there is adequate oversight.

Joe Wheatley asked Senator Blackburn about this, just in case he supports the legality of THESTRIKES. What do you think? Welcomes the investigation by the ACCUSUCAN Act

Because he explained it with unusual sources that are scaling it down to a bluff that you say, then you have to go public. There is another side to it. I think.

All politicians are getting some heat for their oversight tactics. Move one forward, and they haven't answered the need to be smart.

And if they get into a legal battle here, don't say too much. They're saying if they leave the ship, you're leaving the drugs and stuff.

Which could be dangerous, and the other navigation big vote that's floating around the other thing, which I think is a better explanation, is a hostile encounter.

Danger or threat, Caroline Leavitt, or someone who was an interpreter, if those people were alive on the boat, we didn't know about the closeness between our people; anyone could give a signal.

And tell the others what was going on, and they could also retaliate with any of their fighters in the area and start something they didn't start.

Reasons to continue the strike when it comes to the rules of war. At the end of the day, I'm not shedding tears over someone trying to smuggle deadly things into my country

To do that. I don't think it moves the needle for most Americans. A huge contributor to Fox News. He was distinguishing between waterborne attacks on land

As President Trump has indicated, we are preparing to increase our counter-invasion and counter-invasion operations on land. What Mr. Hoffman was explaining

is that if we take it to land, there is a commotion in the water at the moment. The Trump administration will be well protected and will provide more information specifically to Congress and more specifically to Congress.

Inermission? I probably don't need the information from where I sit, but if I'm in Congress, I'd better pray she gives an update.

ONE OF ONE WE ARE KILLING THEM FROM THSKY You want to do it in one bomb, but you can't do it in two? That seems a little silly to me, but you can go for your own argument.

Boats out of water. You are absolutely right. Almost 80 people have been killed in strikes since September, but before this came out, and before the Soulmed was done

And it's all about to end. Ingsam Chapman's presence in defense of the love that has been unnecessarily lost to countless families is on the sidelines of the great advocacy work to secure our borders

and stop the withdrawal that the Trump administration is doing Was Joey saying before you got the questions on the frangments this is a private important question

who are with the hearts and minds of Americans members of Congress, Senate, Democrats who are fresh with the administration that they were not consulted on the decision to kill these bots,

I think after a while, and I have a question for Joey, too. I have heard about a lot of the laws of war that they bring when it comes to this

They were taping their conversations about the protocol, the secretary was talking to the person without consulting all of this would go into it. And can you explain it a little bit?

First of all, I am an enlisted man who I don't think is more redneck in ITTHAN note port that I can only compare to the things that

We killed the facilities. We didn't see if there was a halfway point before he sent it to the meeting the other day. What you're arguing is

that if they're looking at potentially injured people who are still alive, specifically attacking to kill them rather than de-escalating any situation

And along with that, their own laws, which the president has said that international law of disrespect prevents him from doing the right thing within international law

which is opposed to there being a lot of ambiguity for American citizens abroad about the law that regulates how they're doing this and the ethics of it.

We're just getting a soundbite, and then I want to play it off as President Trump, who was asked a few moments ago about these allegations against the act that committed war crimes.

About that, he said he didn't say that, and I believe him. The second start of killing two men? Lexi said he didn't say that he never said that.

OK, Trump asked the Air Force at one point, former Secretary Hegseth said, "When it's apparently a one-strike, kill it and then follow up with a strike." Anonymous sources for your point, further inquiry may be in order

Maybe it should have been done for reporting, if there was a chance or semantics being played out here, he told him later that he was successful.